https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/23/women-artists-_n_6904390.html
Bayeux Tapestry 1086 |
Artemisia Gentileschi, 1610 |
17th and 18th Century painting takes a turn away from the subjects of religion and neoclassism. We begin to see the emergence of women, of both upper and lower classes, performing everyday tasks. We see Judith Leyster and Vermeer painting women sewing, but their tales are completely different. In The Proposition, Leyster, the female painter paints the women sewing and ignoring the man propositioning her for sex. The female in the painting is of a lower class than he, therefore he feels he has the right to make her such an offer. Vermeer's painting, The Lacemaker, portrays the woman well dressed and smiling as she appears to be enjoying her work. "Although art history has been complicit in generalizing such representation into embodiments of of domestic virtue, significant differences in fact exist in the presentation of this type of female labor in dutch art, as well as in the class and material circumstances of the women engaged in it." (Chadwick, 126) The subject again is the same, whereas the perspective is different. Another interesting subject for women is still life and flower paintings. Subjects that were well within the expectations of what females should be painting, and sometimes, it is what their husbands painted.
The biggest shift thus far, seems to be in 19th century Victorian England. What we see in this era is women as workers and as lovers. The subject of Edith Hayler's Feeding the Swans and Alice Walker's Wounded Feelings are portrayals of courtly love. Hayler presents to us the courting process and how we are grooming women from as early as her childhood. The steps in the painting represent all the phases of her life as a woman. Whereas we see in Walker's painting the hurt of unrequited love. The statements made here are more from the heart and the expectations are of the female subject and not their male counterparts. "It may be that in the more heroic and epic works of art the hand of man is best fitted to excel; nevertheless there remain gentle scenes of home interest, and domestic care, delineations of refined feeling and subtle touches of tender emotions, with which the woman artist is eminently entitled to deal', noted by the Englishwoman's Review in 1857. (Chadwick, 182) Times are beginning to shift as women were given opportunities to go to College to become a governess and shortly after being accepted into The National Art Training School allowing women to become trained as art teachers.
http://the-toast.net/2014/11/21/white-marmorean-flock-19th-century-lady-sculptors-rome/
Women throughout Art History, have been the underdogs. They were given the opportunity to paint themselves, doing what men expected women to do. Little by little, female artists started to push the limits. Female artist Rosa Bonheur was encouraged by her family to get a permit for cross dressing. Meanwhile in America, we see the White Marmorean Flock who exchanged marriage and domesticity for professional careers as artists. There subjects were unconventional. They had fewer constraints upon them as women were seen as members of society, albiet not fully and with conditions. They challenged the views of femininity, but were amongst those that felt the same way. These artists were more successful than the female artists before them. In retrospect, they had come so far. Sadly, we still have so far to go.
Rosa Bonheur, 19th Century French Artist |
Works Cited
Chadwick, Whitney. Women, Art and Society. Thames and Hudson World of Art: London. 2012
Guerrilla Girls. The Guerrilla Girls' Beside Companion to the History of Western Art. Penguin Books: New York. 1998
No comments:
Post a Comment