Rebecca Solomon, The Governess, 1853 The painting shows the gender roles as a wife. |
Edith Hayllar, Feeding the Swans, 1889
It shows the gender roles of women in the upper middle class as they age.
|
Women in different classes had different roles in society, but all women were still inferior to the men in their lives and their role was to take care of the household whatever their class was. “Low class women were expected to be housewives and take care of everything to do with the house ... The expectation of working class women was ... to work for their husbands and help them run their business ... Upper class women may have had servants and workers working for them but the women were still expected to take care of the house hold” (Cloud 1). An example of the upper-class women gender roles is in Edith Hayllar, Feeding the Swans. The painting shows the roles of women from Victoria England. The picture depicts two girls below the steps to show how from a young age, woman are domestic caretakers. The higher you are up to the steps, the older you are in the female lifetime. Up the steps, it shows a woman getting courted, which shows the role of a woman finding a man to marry.
“Revolutionary thinkers like Rousseau saw a woman's place, according to both ‘nature’ and ‘reason,’ to be in her home, taking care of those around her” (Guerrilla Girls 39). The expected roles of women in Europe during the Middle Ages was taking care of the home and family. It was a woman’s duty to be a housewife and they were expected to do whatever their husband said. If they were not staying at home, they had very simple jobs. “Women were relegated to unskilled activities in the guilds at an historical moment when the demand was growing for ‘designers’ who could plan patterns for figured cloths and style the finished pieces” (Chadwick 69). Since society believed that women were not capable of doing regular jobs, they were assigned jobs that required no intelligence or experience. Society believed that women were weaker, less intelligent, and could not do the same jobs as men.
Artemisia Gentileschi, Judith and her Maidservant, 1618 |
Orazio Gentileschi, Judith and her Maidservant, 1610 |
The two paintings of Judith and her Maidservant by Artemisia Gentileschi and Orazio Gentileschi shows the different perspectives on women’s gender roles from a woman and male artists.
In the 19th century, female artists became more well known, but it also depended on where they lived and if they were wealthy. “Geography and class played a significant role in shaping the experience of nineteenth-century American women artists” (Chadwick 211). Where the women lived and if they were rich or poor affected if the women artist was successful or not, and it also depended on their location because some places may be more acceptable to women artists than others.
Even though women were becoming more popular from their artwork, they were still not considered equal to men. “Sensitive to the implication of exhibiting women’s art only in relation to other areas of feminine creative activity, and angered because no attention was given to women’s wages and working conditions” (Chadwick 228). Even as time went by, women were still not looked at seriously and society did not care about women, so female artists were being overlooked. Society mainly concentrated on art made by men and disregarded women. Men were treated with more respect and importance compared to women.
Works Cited
Cloud, Amanda. “Gender Roles of Women in the Renaissance.” Gender Roles of Women in the Renaissance, www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/eng/lfletcher/shrew/acloud.htm.
Girls, Guerrilla. The Guerrilla Girls Bedside Companion to the History of Western Art. Penguin Books, 2006.
Girls, Guerrilla. The Guerrilla Girls Bedside Companion to the History of Western Art. Penguin Books, 2006.
No comments:
Post a Comment